Globalization and Its Influence on Social Inequalities and Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia

Authors

  • Indah Maysa Amirtha Universitas Putera Batam
  • Timbul Dompak Universitas Putera Batam
  • Lubna Salsabila Universitas Putera Batam
  • Lenny Husna Universitas Putera Batam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v1i4.161

Keywords:

Globalizatio, social inequality, poverty, Indonesia, inclusive development

Abstract

Globalization has induced substantial changes across multiple facets of life in Indonesia, encompassing social, economic, and cultural dimensions. This study seeks to examine the effects of globalization on social inequality and poverty in Indonesia. The results demonstrate that globalization generates significant opportunities via access to global markets, foreign capital, and cutting-edge technologies. Nonetheless, these advantages are not uniformly allocated, leading to increasing societal inequalities. Communities possessing access to education, technology, and economic resources are more adept at leveraging globalization, but marginalized groups, such as the rural impoverished, often fall behind. Transformations in economic frameworks, urban development, and the impact of global culture intensify regional and socioeconomic disparities. While globalization can alleviate poverty via economic expansion, its advantages frequently favor particular demographics, therefore exacerbating the disparity between the affluent and the impoverished. This study underscores the significance of inclusive and equitable measures to alleviate the adverse effects of globalization. The government must improve access to education, technology, and economic opportunities for marginalized people while bolstering regional development to promote equality. Effective management of globalization can facilitate sustainable development and mitigate social inequality in Indonesia. Without sufficient action, globalization threatens to intensify inequalities and poverty within society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (2002). Globalization and the great U-turn: Income inequality trends in 16 OECD countries. American Journal of Sociology, 107(5), 1244–1299. https://doi.org/10.1086/341329

Arndt, C., & Tarp, F. (2001). Globalization, agricultural growth, and poverty: Evidence from Mozambique. World Development, 29(7), 1233–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00030-6

Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2001). Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy, 26(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00014-8

Bauman, Z. (2000). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chossudovsky, M. (2003). The globalization of poverty and the new world order. Montreal: Global Research.

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. The Economic Journal, 114(493), F22–F49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x

Fischer, S. (2003). Globalization and its challenges. American Economic Review, 93(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321946750

Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London: Profile Books.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heshmati, A. (2006). The world distribution of income and income inequality: A review of the economics literature. Journal of World-Systems Research, 12(1), 61–107. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2006.369

Kanbur, R., & Venables, A. J. (2005). Spatial inequality and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kaplinsky, R. (2005). Globalization, poverty, and inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2000). Globalization: What’s new? What’s not? (And so what?). Foreign Policy, 118, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149673

Lall, S. (2004). Reinventing industrial strategy: The role of government policy in building industrial competitiveness. Annals of Economics and Finance, 5, 147–172.

O’Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. (2002). When did globalization begin? European Review of Economic History, 6(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1361491602000023

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Ravallion, M. (2001). Growth, inequality, and poverty: Looking beyond averages. World Development, 29(11), 1803–1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00072-9

Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Globalization or ‘glocalization’? Networks, territories, and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/0955757042000203632

Wade, R. H. (2004). Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality? World Development, 32(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.007

Downloads

Published

2025-01-20

How to Cite

Indah Maysa Amirtha, Timbul Dompak, Lubna Salsabila, & Lenny Husna. (2025). Globalization and Its Influence on Social Inequalities and Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(4), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v1i4.161

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.