Understanding Digital Governance Practices: The Importance of the Coretax System in Advancing Digital Tax Reform in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v3i1.666Keywords:
Coretax, Digital Governance, Digital Sovereignty, Digital Transformation, Tax Administration ReformAbstract
Coretax (Core Tax Administration System) is an information technology–based tax administration system developed by the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) of Indonesia. This study examines the implementation of the coretax system as one of the government’s efforts to reduce tax leakage by optimizing the existing tax database. This research employs a qualitative method with a literature-based approach. The findings reveal that the coretax system is indeed necessary to be implemented and developed as the foundation of digital tax reform. However, it is important to note that the success of digitalization depends not only on the quality of the platform, but also on the readiness of human resources, infrastructure, and a supportive environment. Therefore, the implementation of coretax needs to be adapted to the conditions of different regions across Indonesia. It should be introduced gradually and piloted in selected areas, accompanied by extensive dissemination and public education regarding the coretax system through both offline and online channels to ensure that the objectives of system reform can be achieved. Internally, the government must strengthen the digital competencies of state apparatuses, take an active role in auditing, integrating, and mitigating the coretax system, and promote system interoperability. In this way, coretax can become a significant testing ground for Indonesia’s digital sovereignty.
Downloads
References
Aji, M. A. P. (2024). Jelang peluncuran, ratusan wajib pajak Kaltimtara berkesempatan simulasikan Coretax. https://pajak.go.id/id/berita/jelang-peluncuran-ratusan-wajib-pajak-kaltimtara-berkesempatan-simulasikan-coretax
Angelina, I. & Sari, H.G.I. (2025). Digital innovation and tax transparency: Investigating system quality, usability, and data security in Core Tax among Indonesian tax consultants. Proceedings of the Bakrie International Conference on Communication, Management, Politics & Accounting (BICOMPACT) 2025, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5881962
Arianty, F. (2024). Implementation challenges and opportunities Coretax administration system on the efficiency of tax administration. Jurnal Vokasi Indonesia, 12(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.7454/jvi.v12i2.1227
Aribowo, I., Kamilah, N. N., Kumar, J., & Rofi’ah, L. (2022). Assessing tax reform as a journey to tax administration. KnE Social Sciences, 2022, 503-523. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i5.10574
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Indeks pembangunan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi 2023 Volume 6. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dimetheo, G., Salsabila, A., & Izaak, N. C. A. (2023). Implementasi Core tax administration system sebagai upaya mendorong kepatuhan pajak di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ekonomi Dan Perpajakan, 3(1), 10-25.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
Fuady, A. H. (2018). Teknologi digital dan ketimpangan ekonomi di Indonesia. Masyarakat Indonesia, 44(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v44i1.803
Garvin, D. A. (1984). What does “product quality” really mean? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25-43.
Hanum, A. N. (2005). Permasalahan pajak Indonesia. Value Added: Majalah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1-9.
Indrajit, R. E. (2004). Electronic government: Strategi pembangunan dan pengembangan sistem pelayanan publik berbasis teknologi digital. Andi.
Janssen, M., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2005). Stages of growth in e-government: An architectural approach. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(4), 193-200.
Judijanto, L., Arum, M., dan Kaswoto, J. (2026). Tax administration transformation through the implementation of Coretax DJP in 2025. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 5(1), 4144-4151. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i1.6705
Komarudin & Hermawan, P. (2022). A study of trust base voluntary tax compliance through tax administration digital transformation in Indonesia. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 5(8), 3227-3238. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V5-i8-53
Luthfia, A. R. (2021). Dialektika kebijakan publik. KBM Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gv4nu
Luthfia, A. R. (2025). Desentralisasi dan kuasa negara. KBM Indonesia.
Luthfia, A. R., & Alkhajar, E. N. S. (2018). E-complaint, smart city and local government in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 241, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.2991/icosaps-18.2018.30
Ma, L. (2020). Digital governance in China. In X. Zang & H. S. Chan (Eds.). Handbook of public policy and public administration in China (pp. 122-135). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nielsen, J. (1993) Usability engineering. Academic Press.
OECD. (2025). Tax administration digitalisation and digital transformation initiatives. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c076d776-en
Pajak.go.id. (2025). Coretax. https://pajak.go.id/id/reformdjp/coretax
Panjaitan, M. R., & Yuna. (2024). Pengaruh Coretax terhadap transparansi dan akuntabilitas sistem perpajakan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 2(4), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.54066/jura-itb.v2i4.2560
Perpres No. 40 Tahun 2018 tentang Pembaruan Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan.
Puura, A., Soe, R.-M., & Thabit, S. (2026). Advancing interoperability of data exchange in Europe: Insights from Estonia’s experience for the common European data spaces. Data in Brief, 64, 112361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2025.112361
Rahmawati, R., & Nurcahyani, N. (2025). Coretax system dalam upaya reformasi administrasi perpajakan, apa urgensinya? Jurnal Financia: Akuntasi dan Keuangan, 6(1), 1-8.
Rahmi, N., Arimbhi, P., & Hidayat, V. S. (2023). Analisis manajemen strategi kebijakan pembaharuan Core tax administration system (CTAS) dalam upaya penguatan reformasi administrasi perpajakan di Indonesia. Transparansi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 6(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.31334/transparansi.v6i2.3480
Sastri, M. IIDAM., Yoga, I. G. A. P., Datrini, L. K. (2025). DJP online update towards Coretax system according to consultants’ perception. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 8(6), 2838-2843. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V8-i6-15
Susanto, H., & Iswara, P. (Eds.). (2023). Reformasi administrasi pajak dari masa ke masa. DJP Kementerian Keuangan.
World Bank. (2020). Indonesia digital economy report. World Bank Publications.
Wulandari, D. S., & Dasman, S. (2023). Taxpayer compliance: The role of taxation digitalization system and technology acceptance model (TAM) with internet understanding as a mediating variable. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(6), 2385-2396. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i6.4653
Wyld, D. C. (2010). The cloudy future of government IT: Cloud computing and the public sector around the world. International Journal of Web and Semantic Technology, 1(1), 1-20.
Leony. (2025, February 15). Coretax masih bermasalah, ekonom UGM sebut ada 4 penyebab utamanya. Universitas Gajah Mada. https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/coretax-masih-bermasalah-ekonom-ugm-sebut-ada-4-penyebab-utamanya/
Amila, N. (2026, January 8). Realisasi penerimaan perpajakan capai Rp 2.217,9 triliun pada 2025, atau 89 persen dari target. https://www.pajak.com/pajak/realisasi-penerimaan-perpajakan-capai-rp2-2179-triliun-pada-2025-atau-89-persen-dari-target/
Widyatama, E. (2026, March 8). Alarm utang RI menyala: Debt service ratio tembus 42%, apa artinya? CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20260226104310-128-714087/alarm-utang-ri-menyala-debt-service-ratio-tembus-42-apa-artinya
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science and Humanity

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


