The Performance of Student Administrative Services in the Society 5.0 Era: Evidence from Gorontalo State University

Authors

  • Yulianti Taib Universitas Negeri Gorontal
  • Asna Aneta Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Sri Yulianty Mozin Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijhs.v3i3.644

Keywords:

Accessibility, Scholarship Administration, Service Performance, Society 5.0, Student Administrative Services

Abstract

This study examines the performance of student administrative services in the Society 5.0 era at the Bureau of Academic Affairs, Student Affairs, and Planning of Gorontalo State University, focusing on scholarship services. It addresses the need for accessible, responsive, transparent, inclusive, and student-centered administrative services in higher education. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis. Informants included bureau leaders, scholarship and financial aid administrators, operational officers, and students receiving various scholarship schemes. Thematic analysis was conducted through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, while validity was ensured through source triangulation, method triangulation, and member checking. The findings show that accessibility has improved through service counters, websites, social media, WhatsApp, online forms, SIMPEL BAKP, and coordination with faculties and study programs. However, information remains fragmented, digital standard operating procedures are not uniform, and disability-inclusive access is limited. Responsiveness is supported by direct and digital communication, but it lacks a dedicated complaint system, automatic notifications, selection-status dashboards, and real-time disbursement tracking. Service quality is perceived as fairly good because students experience professional, friendly, and fair treatment. Nevertheless, service documentation, procedural standardization, staff training, and humanistic technology integration need strengthening. The study concludes that scholarship administration should be transformed into a centralized, inclusive, responsive, transparent, and student-centered digital-humanistic service model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abduh, A., Rosmaladewi, R., & Basri, M. (2018). Internationalization awareness and commitment of Indonesian higher education. The New Educational Review, 51(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2018.51.1.13

Aldarmahi, A., Algahtani, H., Al-Rabia, M. W., Abuarab, N., & Shirah, B. (2019). Determination of quality gap for educational services in undergraduate medical education. Saudi Medical Journal, 40(6), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2019.6.24189

Aleu, F. G., Gutierrez, E. M. A. G., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Villegas, J. B. G., & Vázquez-Hernández, J. (2021). Increasing service quality at a university: A continuous improvement project. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(2–3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2021-0020

Alsheyadi, A., & Albalushi, J. (2020). Service quality of student services and student satisfaction: The mediating effect of cross-functional collaboration. The TQM Journal, 32(6), 1197–1215. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2019-0234

Bui, H. T. T., Quyen, B. T. T., Nguyen, T. T. P., Cao, Q. H., Phung, T. V., & Thành, N. H. (2022). Assessing the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and loyalty: The Vietnamese higher education experience. Quality Assurance in Education, 31(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-01-2022-0015

Essaoudi, M., & Lotfi, R. (2021). Assessment of the quality of the training system in Moroccan higher education institutions: Case of the sciences and techniques of physical and sports activities. International Journal of Information Technology and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.52502/ijitas.v3i2.27

Friedrich, P. E. (2019). Organizational change in higher education ministries in light of agencification: Comparing Austria and Norway. Higher Education Policy, 34(3), 664–684. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00157-x

Giest, S., & Samuels, A. (2022). Administrative burden in digital public service delivery: The social infrastructure of library programs for e-inclusion. Review of Policy Research, 40(5), 626–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12516

Hamzah, Z., Purwati, A. A., & Hamzah, M. L. (2019). A SERVQUAL and quality function deployment (QFD) approach in measuring total quality management at private universities in Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia. Journal of Economic Info, 6(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.31580/jei.v6i1.487

Juan, L., & Nair, S. M. (2022). Students’ expectation and perception on service quality in a public higher vocational college in China. International Academic Journal of Education and Literature, 3(3), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.47310/iajel.2022.v03i03.004

Kim, S., Wellstead, A., & Heikkila, T. (2022). Policy capacity and rise of data-based policy innovation labs. Review of Policy Research, 40(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12494

Lee, K. M. K., Page, A., Kim, S., Al-Diery, T., Koeper, I., Singh, I., Hawthorne, D., & Johnson, J. (2023). Perceptions and expectations of health professionals regarding hospital pharmacy services and the roles of hospital pharmacists: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 10, Article 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100264

Liu, P., Gong, X., Yao, Q., & Liu, Q. (2022). Impacts of the medical arms race on medical expenses: A public hospital-based study in Shenzhen, China, during 2009–2013. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00407-7

Mesa, D. (2023). Digital divide, e-government and trust in public service: The key role of education. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1140416

Minja, M. D., Ryakitimbo, C. M., Lawrence, M. L., & Francis, N. (2024). Students’ perceptions on sustainable service quality in higher education using SERVQUAL model: A case of Tanzania Institute of Accountancy Singida Campus. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 22(8), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2024/v22i8560

Mohammadi, M. K., Mohibbi, A. A., & Hedayati, M. H. (2021). Investigating the challenges and factors influencing the use of the learning management system during the COVID-19 pandemic in Afghanistan. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5165–5198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10517-z

Persad, D., Farrell, P., Alonzo-Williams, C., & Sargeant, R. (2023). Towards a model of service excellence at a community college in Trinidad and Tobago. Quality Assurance in Education, 31(3), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-08-2022-0155

Polin, K., Yiğitcanlar, T., Limb, M., & Washington, T. L. (2023). The making of smart campus: A review and conceptual framework. Buildings, 13(4), 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13040891

Rezaei, S., Matin, B. K., Hajizadeh, M., Soroush, A., Mohammadi, Z., Babakhany, M., & Jamshidi, K. (2017). Evaluating service quality in the higher education sector in Iran: An examination of students’ perspective. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, 10(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-12-2016-0024

Rizalihadi, T., & Satispi, E. (2025). Manajemen pelayanan publik: Teori, regulasi, inovasi, dan tantangan era Society 5.0. Penerbit Widina.

Rosa, M., Schmitz, F., Tekian, A., & Guttormsen, S. (2025). Enhancing institutional processes and student experience in higher education through journey mapping: A systematic review. Review of Education, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70100

Setapa, M., Pauzi, N. M., Halif, M. M., Hassan, N. S. N., Nik Mohd Faris Nik Min, Mamat, M., Mustafa, T., Zulkifli, N. S. M., Ismail, J., & Nurdiana, E. (2024). Relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in academic affairs unit. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i1/19989

Shraga-Roitman, Y., Shpigelman, C., Schreuer, N., Sachs, D., & Mor, S. (2025). The role of administrative staffs’ self-efficacy in promoting inclusive higher education: A case of students with disabilities. Work, 81(4), 3184–3193. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251329203

Stegenga, S. M., Sinclair, J., Knowles, C., Storie, S., & Seeley, J. R. (2021). Lived experiences of mental health in higher education: A comparative analysis of determinants to supports and services. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91(6), 738–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000575

Sziegat, H. (2022). Transforming governance of German higher education institutions. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 7(3), 472–517. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1164190

Utami, E., & Regita, D. B. A. (2023). Analysis of student satisfaction with student affairs unit services. Journal of Novel Engineering Science and Technology, 2(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.56741/jnest.v2i02.370

Vidal, I. M. G. (2022). Architectures of contemporary digital platforms in education: Analysis of exclusion processes. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(4), 1445–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00887-7

Vidal, I. M. G., & Barujel, A. G. (2021). Socioeducational gaps derived from the impact of digitization in Spain 2020. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 21(68). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.465571

Downloads

Published

2026-06-06

How to Cite

Yulianti Taib, Asna Aneta, & Sri Yulianty Mozin. (2026). The Performance of Student Administrative Services in the Society 5.0 Era: Evidence from Gorontalo State University. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 3(3), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijhs.v3i3.644

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.