Juridical Analysis Of The Mechanism Of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture In The Settlement Of Corruption Crimes

Farida Wulandari; Soerya Respationo; Erniyanti Erniyanti

doi:10.62951/ijss.v1i3.48

Juridical Analysis Of The Mechanism Of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture In The Settlement Of Corruption Crimes

Authors

Farida Wulandari University of Batam
Soerya Respationo Universitas Batam
Erniyanti Erniyanti Universitas Batam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v1i3.48

Keywords:

Juridical Analysis, Asset Forfeiture, Corruption Crime

Abstract

Corruption is one of the major problems that hinder development and prosperity in Indonesia. In Batam City, the handling of corruption crimes is often not optimal, especially in the aspect of recovering illegally obtained assets. The Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCBAF) mechanism is one of the instruments that is expected to accelerate the process of recovering state losses without having to wait for criminal punishment. This research aims to assist in the regulation of NCBAF laws and standards in resolving corruption crimes in Batam City, as well as identify the obstacles faced and efforts that can be made to optimize their implementation. The research methods used are normative juridical and empirical juridical. The normative juridical approach is carried out by reviewing relevant regulations, including Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes, as well as related literature. The empirical juridical approach is carried out through case studies and interviews with law enforcement officials in Batam City. The results of the study show that although the NCBAF has been regulated in the regulations, its implementation in Batam City still faces various obstacles, such as lack of coordination between law enforcement agencies, high standards of proof, unclear legal procedures, and limited resources and technical capacity of the apparatus. Examples of corruption in infrastructure assistance, embezzlement of social funds, and corruption in the procurement of goods and services show that assets suspected of originating from criminal acts often cannot be immediately confiscated and utilized by the state. To overcome these obstacles, this study suggests increased coordination between law enforcement agencies through the formation of special teams, the preparation of clear standard operating procedures (SOPs), intensification of training for law enforcement officials, increased international cooperation, and community campaigns to increase public awareness and support. With these steps, the NCBAF is expected to become a more effective instrument in eradicating corruption and recovering state losses in Batam City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. (2012). Menguak tabir hukum (suatu kajian filosofis dan sosiologis). Toko Gunung Agung.

Ali, A. (2012). Menguak teori hukum (legal theory) dan teori peradilan (judicialprudence). Kencana Prenada Group.

Anonimous. (2023). Buku pedoman penyusunan proposal dan tesis program magister ilmu hukum pascasarjan (S2). Universitas Batam.

Arief, B. N. (2003). Kapita selekta hukum pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Atmasasmita, R. (2002). Korupsi, good government dan komisi anti korupsi di Indonesia. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.

Atmasasmita, R. (2019). Teori hukum integratif. Mandar Maju.

Danil, H. E. (2011). Korupsi: Konsep, tindak pidana, dan pemberantasannya (Cet. 1). Rajawali Press.

Dimyati, K. (2015). Teorisasi hukum: Studi tentang perkembangan pemikiran hukum di Indonesia 1945-1990. Muhamadiyah University Press.

Efendi, A., et al. (2017). Teori hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Erniyanti. (2024). Reformasi birokrasi. Gita Lentera.

Friedman, L. M. (2009). Sistem hukum dalam perspektif ilmu sosial ("The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective"). Nusa Media.

Friedman, W. (2010). Teori dan filsafat hukum: Telaah kritis atas teori-teori hukum (Susunan I) (M. Arifin, Trans.). Rajawali.

Fuady, M. (2013). Teori-teori besar (grand theory) dalam hukum. Kencana.

Hamzah, A. (2018). Kamus hukum. Citra Umbara.

Huijbers, T. (2011). Filsafat hukum. Kanisius.

Isra, S. (2009). Kekuasaan dan perilaku korupsi. Kompas.

Kansil, C. S. T., Kansil, C. S. T., Palandeng, E. R., & Mamahit, G. N. (2009). Kamus istilah hukum. Kencana.

Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Manan, B. (1999). Beberapa catatan atas rancangan undang-undang tentang minyak dan gas bumi. FH UNPAD.

Muhajir, N. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Roke Sarasin.

Pangaribuan, L. M. P. (2016). Hukum pidana khusus (tindak pidana ekonomi, pencucian uang, korupsi, dan kerjasama internasional, serta pengembalian aset). Pustaka Kemang.

Parthiana, I. W. (2022). Hukum perjanjian internasional bagian I. Mandar Maju.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 01 Tahun 2013 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Permohonan Penanganan Harta Kekayaan dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang atau Tindak Pidana Lain..

Rahardjo, S. (2016). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rasyidi, L. (2006). Dasar-dasar filsafat hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rato, D. (2010). Filsafat hukum: Mencari, memahami dan memahami hukum. Laksbang Pressindo.

Sidharta, A. (2016). Meuwissen tentang pengembangan hukum, ilmu hukum, teori hukum dan filsafat hukum. Refika Aditama.

Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (2009). Metode penelitian survei. LP3ES.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2013). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soemitro, R. H. (2015). Metodologi penelitian hukum (Cet. 2). Ghalia Indonesia.

Soeroso. (2011). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Soeryasumantri, J. S. (2008). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Sinar Harapan.

Suhartono, I. (2009). Metode penelitian sosial: Suatu teknik penelitian bidang kesejahteraan sosial lainnya. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Suseno, F. M. (2016). Pemikiran Karl Marx: Dari sosialisme utopis ke perselisihan revisionisme (Cet. 10). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Syahrani, R. (2009). Rangkuman intisari ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.

Zainal, A. (2012). Pengantar tata hukum Indonesia. Rajawali Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-02

How to Cite

Farida Wulandari, Soerya Respationo, & Erniyanti Erniyanti. (2024). Juridical Analysis Of The Mechanism Of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture In The Settlement Of Corruption Crimes. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(3), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v1i3.48