Analysis of Public Perceptions of the Government's Role in Increasing Community Participation: A Quantitative Approach

Authors

  • Ragoan Alhamid Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Charis Christiani Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Sumarmo Sumarmo Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v3i1.598

Keywords:

Community Participation, Good Governance, Government Accountability, Government Transparency, Public Perception

Abstract

Government and government transparency on community participation, with government accountability as an intervening variable. The study used a quantitative approach based on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Data were obtained through questionnaires distributed to the community of Maladum Mes District, Sorong City. The results show that government transparency and public perception of the government's role have a positive and significant effect on government accountability. In addition, government transparency, public perception, and government accountability have a positive and significant effect on community participation. The mediation test results show that government accountability partially mediates the effects of government transparency and public perception of the government's role on community participation. These findings confirm that increasing community participation depends not only on information disclosure and positive perceptions, but also on the extent to which the government is accountable to the public for its performance. This study offers theoretical implications for strengthening the concept of good governance and practical implications for local governments in designing participatory policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 26 (Edisi 10). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2020). Partial least squares: Konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan program SmartPLS 3.2.9 (Edisi 3). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge, and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429667

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hamzah, A., et al. (2024). Government transparency and public accountability [Details to be verified from source].

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

Madinah, S. (2025). Transparency in budget management and development programs [Details to be verified from source].

Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739–777. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110997

Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383

Nugroho, R., & Pratama, A. (2022). Government communication strategies and public trust [Details to be verified from source].

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Nuri, M. (2024). Performance accountability and policy accountability in government [Details to be verified from source].

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Putra, D. (2024). Community participation as a social control mechanism [Details to be verified from source].

Rahman, F. (2023). Trust and community participation in public policy [Details to be verified from source].

Rumakat, J. (2025). Public perception and government performance [Details to be verified from source].

Sari, N., & Wibowo, A. (2023). Public participation in democratic governance [Details to be verified from source].

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi 2). Alfabeta.

Syeftiani, R. (2023). Public perception as a reflection of trust in government [Details to be verified from source].

Tauda, R. (2025). Government accountability and public legitimacy [Details to be verified from source].

Vidyasari, P., & Suryono, B. (2022). Government accountability and citizen participation [Details to be verified from source].

Widodo, S., & Pratiwi, D. (2023). Pengukuran persepsi dan sikap dalam penelitian kuantitatif [Details to be verified from original source].

Yang, K. (2005). Public administrators’ trust in citizens: A missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00453.x

Downloads

Published

2026-03-02

How to Cite

Ragoan Alhamid, Charis Christiani, & Sumarmo Sumarmo. (2026). Analysis of Public Perceptions of the Government’s Role in Increasing Community Participation: A Quantitative Approach. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 3(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v3i1.598

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.