Interpretation of Debt-to-Equity Conversion for Goods Purchase Transactions Under POJK 14/2019

Authors

  • Muhammad Rausyan Fikry Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Iwan Erar Joesoef Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Diani Sadia Wati Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v2i2.388

Keywords:

Debt Conversion, Capital Increase Without Pre-Emptive Rights, Investor Protection, Legal Certainty, Shares

Abstract

Interpretation of debt-to-equity swap provisions for goods purchase transactions as stipulated in the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) Number 14/POJK.04/2019 concerning Affiliated Transactions and Conflicts of Interest in Certain Transactions. The principle of openness and fairness in transactions between affiliated parties, including in the context of debt-to-equity swaps. However, this provision does not explicitly regulate the conversion of debt arising from goods purchase transactions, thus creating room for legal interpretation regarding whether business debt from operational activities can be converted into equity participation through the issuance of new shares. This study aims to analyze the implementation of debt-to-equity conversion as a financial restructuring strategy, with a focus on legal certainty and protection of public shareholders based on POJK 14/2019. The study uses a normative legal approach with the method of statutory regulations and case studies on PT SLJ Global Tbk. The results of the study indicate that PT SLJ Global Tbk has complied with the formal procedures of POJK 14/2019, including information disclosure, GMS approval, and unaffiliated creditor criteria. However, the conversion of business debt creates legal ambiguity due to the lack of clarity as to whether the debt meets the definition of “loan” in POJK 14/2019. In addition, the dilution of public shares by 34.32% without adequate protection mechanisms indicates a lack of legal certainty. The study recommends normative interpretation and strengthening of regulations to ensure fairness and legal certainty in the practice of debt conversion.

Keywords: ; ; ; ; 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] IMF. External Relations Dept., “Finance & Development, June 1988,” Finance Dev., vol. 25, no. 02, 1988, doi: 10.5089/9781616353735.022.

[2] I. Nadilah and K. Yulita, “Analisis Penerapan Metode Debt to Equity Swap dalam Perspektif Konsultan Pajak untuk Pemulihan Struktur dan Kesehatan Finansial Perusahaan,” J. Bisnis Mhs., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1430–1442, May 2025, doi: 10.60036/jbm.644.

[3] Indo Premier, “Konversi Sisa Utang, SLJ Global (SULI) Lanjut Private Placement 327,18 Juta Saham,” Indo Premier. [Online]. Available: https://www.indopremier.com/ipotnews/newsDetail.php?jdl=Konversi_Sisa_Utang__SLJ_Global_%28SULI%29_Lanjut_Private_Placement_327_18_Juta_Saham&news_id=440244&group_news=RESEARCHNEWS&news_date=&taging_subtype=PG002&name=&search=y_general&q=%2C&halaman=1

[4] F. Shah, Y. Liu, Y. Shah, and F. Shah, “Influence of shareholder equity on trade credit demand: The study of non-financial firms in Pakistan,” R-Economy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2021, doi: 10.15826/recon.2021.7.1.006.

[5] A. Alvianda, “Rencana Aksi Korporasi private placement yang Dilakukan oleh PT. SLJ GLOBAL, Tbk. terhadap CARRIEDO Limited,” J. Suara Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 215, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.26740/jsh.v2n2.p215-233.

[6] M. Muslih, “Negara Hukum Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum),” Leg. J. Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 130–152, 2017.

[7] Z. A. Zahyney-Zabolotenko and N. M. Panchenko, “Possibility of retroactive effect of judicial interpretation of criminal law in the context of its legal certainty,” Anal. Comp. Jurisprud., no. 5, pp. 688–693, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2024.05.106.

[8] H. P. Lundsgaarde, “The Economics of Justice . Richard A. Posner.,” Am. Anthropol., vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 666–667, Sep. 1982, doi: 10.1525/aa.1982.84.3.02a00250.

[9] R. H. Coase, “Law and Economics at Chicago,” J. Law Econ., vol. 36, no. 1, Part 2, pp. 239–254, Apr. 1993, doi: 10.1086/467274.

[10] F. Hayek, Law, Legislation, and Liberty (A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy). London: Routledge, 2022. doi: 10.4324/9781003320777.

[11] C. E. S. Warburton, Economic Analysis and Law. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429343964.

[12] M. Reza Saputra and Wicipto Setiadi, “Implementation Of General Principles Of Good Government In The Organization Of The 2024 Elections,” Int. J. Law Soc., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 94–112, May 2024, doi: 10.62951/ijls.v1i3.65.

[13] I. Akbar, “Implementation Of Debt To Equity Swap As A Corporation Debt Restructuring Effort,” Leg. Br., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3070–3080, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://legal.isha.or.id/index.php/legal/article/view/622

[14] D. K. Harjono, “Standard Agreements in the Concept of Freedom of Contract,” Russ. Law J., vol. 11, no. 3, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.52783/rlj.v11i3.1254.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-21

How to Cite

Muhammad Rausyan Fikry, Iwan Erar Joesoef, & Diani Sadia Wati. (2025). Interpretation of Debt-to-Equity Conversion for Goods Purchase Transactions Under POJK 14/2019. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v2i2.388

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.