Digitalization of Bureaucracy and Good Governance
A Literature Review of Indonesian Public Administration Reforms in the Post–New Order Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v1i2.478Keywords:
bureaucratic digitalisation, good governance, e-government, public administration reform, SPBEAbstract
This article examines the role of bureaucratic digitalisation in advancing good governance in post-New Order Indonesia based on a narrative literature review. Employing an integrative framework that connects Good Governance theory, E-Government, Digital Era Governance, and Institutional Theory, this study analyses literature published between 1998 and 2024 drawn from academic journals, policy documents, and national–international institutional reports. The findings indicate that, although Indonesia has achieved notable progress in digital regulation and infrastructure, reflected in the adoption of SPBE and the increase in the EGDI from 0.3690 (2012) to 0.6612 (2022), implementation continues to face severe structural and institutional constraints. Five key themes emerge: progressive policy development yet uneven implementation; a transparency paradox between rhetoric and practice; severe interregional digital divides; institutional resistance rooted in patrimonial administrative culture; and the ambivalent effects of digitalisation on public service quality. This study concludes that the digitalisation of bureaucracy has not fundamentally transformed good governance due to an excessive emphasis on technological solutions in the absence of institutional and cultural reconfiguration. Policy recommendations include contextual strategies based on local capacity, sustained investment in civil servant capacity building, and reforms to bureaucratic incentive structures. This study contributes to the e-government literature in developing countries by providing a critical analysis of the persistent gap between policy adoption and actual implementation.
Downloads
References
Azis, A. (2016). Implementasi e-government di Indonesia: Peluang dan tantangan. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik, 4(2), 1–15.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.* https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2019). Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101409.* https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101409
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.* https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.* https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
Furuholt, B., & Wahid, F. (2008). E-government challenges and the role of political leadership in Indonesia: The case of Sragen. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.134
Gil-García, J. R., & Martínez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 266–290.* https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.04.005
Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Decentralisation and democracy in Indonesia: A critique of neo-institutionalist perspectives. Development and Change, 35(4), 697–718.*https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2004.00376.x
Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment: An international text. Sage Publications.* https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220191
Hossain, M. D., et al. (2019). Electronic government and developing countries: An analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications, 182(35), 1–6.
Junaidi, A., & Suyudi, M. (2021). Digital divide dan implementasi e-government di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(1), 45–62.
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2021). Laporan evaluasi SPBE nasional 2021. Kementerian PAN-RB.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four-stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.* https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Lestari, P., Setyowati, E., & Mardiasmo, D. (2019). E-government dan kualitas pelayanan publik di pemerintah daerah: Bukti empiris dari Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 8(3), 234–251.
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1987), 20120382.* https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Meijer, A., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on innovative urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.* https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
Mustafid, M., & Wicaksono, K. W. (2020). Implementasi keterbukaan informasi publik di era digital: Studi kasus pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 16(2), 134–149.
Nurmandi, A., & Kim, S. (2015). Making e-procurement work in a decentralised procurement system: A comparison of three Indonesian cities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(3), 198–220.* https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2015-0035
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

