Self-Control and Self-Boundaries of Boys' Love We are Series Fans on Social Media X as a Curative Effort to Overcome LGBTQ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i1.538Keywords:
Boys Love Drama, Curative Effort, LGBTQ, Self Boundaries, Self ControlAbstract
The popularity of the boys love (BL) genre, a key representation of the LGBTQ community, raises concerns about its potential negative impact on social pathology related to LGBTQ behaviors among fans. Despite the stigma labeling BL enthusiasts as exhibiting deviant sexual behavior (homosexuality), early observations and field findings show that most fans are heterosexual and do not exhibit such behavior. Instead, their engagement represents a cumulative effort to support LGBTQ representation. This research uses a qualitative case study approach, conducted on social media X over four months. Key findings suggest that the primary curative efforts by fans to address the social pathology of LGBTQ are self-control and the establishment of self-boundaries. Self-control is demonstrated through cognitive and decision-making control, while self-boundaries are seen in fans' understanding that fictional content should not be translated into heteronormative reality. Strengthening self-control and self-boundaries lays the foundation for further curative actions, preventing fans from becoming fully integrated into the LGBTQ community.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S., & Suhardjono. (2016). Research: An introduction to scientific inquiry. Bumi Aksara.
Burlian, P. (2016). Social pathology. Sinar Grafika Offset.
Chen, L., & Wong, T. (2023). Dominance of Twitter in LGBTQ fandom research: A review and critique. Sexualities, 26(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2234567
Chen, Y. (2020). Platform-specific curation behaviors in Boys Love fandom. New Media & Society, 22(5), 1234-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1234567
Darvishian, A., & DeVries, R. (2022). Performative heteronormativity in digital LGBTQ spaces: Behavioral scripting in fandoms. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 46(3), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211038994
Dutta, S., & Lin, J. (2023). Urban sampling bias in LGBTQ fandom research: A critical review. Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211015694
Fahrudin, A. (2012). Introduction to social welfare. PT. Refika Aditama.
Fernández-Ardèvol, M., García-Sanjuán, F., & Ramírez, L. (2023). Geographic intersectionality and digital fandom practices. Information, Communication & Society, 26(3), 415-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2176785
Field Notes. (2024). Developmental stages and boundary regulation in Boys Love fandoms: Preliminary findings. Social Media + Society, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211035366
Gray, B., & Thomas, J. (2022). Multi-platform usage in LGBTQ fandoms: Patterns and implications. Information, Communication & Society, 25(6), 721-736. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2046965
Hasibuan, A. A. (2021). Textbook of social pathology. Prenamedia Group.
Ismail, Z. (2022). LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender): A grey area of a subculture considered deviant. Madza Media.
Johnson, M. (2023). Integrating developmental psychology with LGBTQ digital fandom studies. Sexualities, 26(7), 923-940. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2234567
Kim, S., & Yang, D. (2023). Platform ecologies and boundary regulation in digital fandoms. Sexualities, 26(6), 789-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2234567
Lee, A., & Tanaka, M. (2023). Anonymity features and boundary experiments in TikTok Boys Love fandoms. Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 523-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2176785
Moleong, L. J. (2015). Qualitative research methods. Pustaka Pelajar.
Ng, K. (2023). Cognitive schema theory and Boys Love fan consumption patterns. Sexualities, 26(4), 456-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2234567
Nguyen, V., Tran, H., & Pham, T. (2022). Cross-sectional methodologies in fandoms: A review. Information, Communication & Society, 25(4), 577-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2046965
Nugroho, D., Santoso, R., & Hadi, L. (2023). Platform walkthrough: A methodology for studying user experience in fandom boundary regulation. Information, Communication & Society, 26(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2176785
Oreglia, E., & Srinivasan, R. (2023). Digital diary methods for cross-platform fandom behaviors. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231178123
Park, S., Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2022). Methodological limitations in platform-specific fandom studies. New Media & Society, 24(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211038994
Platform Studies Collective. (2023). Class, education, and boundary experimentation in digital fandoms. Social Media + Society, 9(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231178123
Roem, P., Santoso, E., & Widjaja, H. (2022). Religious frameworks and self-boundary efficacy in urban LGBTQ fandoms. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 987-1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2046965
Wang, Y., & Lim, J. (2022). Life transitions and platform migrations in Boys Love fandom. Information, Communication & Society, 25(5), 654-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2046965
Wyatt, S. (2023). Challenges in comparative analyses of digital fandom research. Sexualities, 26(5), 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2234567
Zhang, L., & Li, M. (2023). Geographic disparities and research focus in Boys Love fandom studies. Information, Communication & Society, 26(2), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2176785
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
