Teaching Strategies and the Quality of Science Education for Upper Grade Elementary School Students

Authors

  • Atri Yuni Universitas Patompo
  • Elpisah Elpisah Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Rego Devila Universitas Patompo
  • Suarlin Suarlin Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i1.571

Keywords:

Learning Media, Science Learning, Student Characteristics, Teacher Challenges, Teaching Strategies

Abstract

This study aims to analyze teachers' teaching strategies in improving the quality of science learning for upper grade students (IV, V, and VI) at the SD Inpres Perumnas II Makassar. The results show that teachers implement various strategies including selecting approaches that suit students' needs, using a variety of learning methods, actively involving students in learning activities, utilizing media that support conceptual understanding, and implementing continuous evaluation to assess learning success. All of these strategies complement each other and help create more engaging, understandable, and relevant science learning for students. Research findings also revealed that the choice of teaching strategy is influenced by several important factors: student characteristics, the characteristics of the science material being taught, the availability of learning media and facilities, the learning environment, and the desired learning objectives. These five factors serve as the basis for teachers to determine the most appropriate strategy, ensuring a more effective, focused learning process that enhances students' understanding of the material. Furthermore, this study identified several challenges teachers face in implementing science teaching strategies, such as diverse student abilities, time constraints, a lack of supporting media and facilities, sub-conducive classroom conditions, and uneven student motivation. These challenges require teachers to be creative and adapt strategies to ensure learning objectives are achieved and the quality of science instruction continues to improve.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] N. Nursidah, M. Yunus, and E. Elpisah, “Pengaruh Supervisi Akademik Kepala Sekolah dan Budaya Sekolah Terhadap Mutu Mengajar Guru,” J. Pendidik. Ekon., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2021, doi: 10.26740/jupe.v10n1.p38-44.

[2] Suarlin, N. MY, and M. N. F. Arsyad, “Analisis Program Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru dalam Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka,” EDUKATIF J. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 01, no. 03, pp. 85–94, 2025.

[3] R. Fadillah, Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif di Era Digital. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2021.

[4] E. Rahmawati and R. Syahrul, “Strategi Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Ilmu Pendidik. Nusant., vol. 5, no. 1, 2022.

[5] J. Jusmawati, I. Baharuddin, M. Mahdi, and M. F. W, “Pengembangan Pendidikan Karakter dan Profil Pelajar Pancasila Berwawasan Kearifan Lokal,” J. Educ. Dev. Inst. Pendidik. Tapanuli Selatan, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/5127%0Ahttps://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/5127/3111

[6] R. Ratna, M. Yahya, M. Fahreza, and E. Elpisah, “Problem Based Learning Berbantuan MEDIA Questions Box Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Smanpinrang,” J. Educ. Dev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2023.

[7] A. S. Putri and I. Maulana, “Pembelajaran IPAS Berbasis Lingkungan pada Kurikulum Merdeka,” J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 2, 2020.

[8] N. Wahyuni, “Model Kooperatif dan Partisipasi Aktif Murid,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 8, no. 1, 2022.

[9] W. Sari and H. Firmansyah, “Kreativitas Guru dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran,” J. Inov. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 2, 2021.

[10] H. J. Pentury, “Pengembangan Kreativitas Guru dalam Pembelajaran Kreatif Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 265–272, 2017.

[11] N. MY, M. Ardiansyah, and A. A. Sarbani, “Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa Melalui Model Project Based Learning dengan Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa Melalui Model Project Based Learning dengan Pendekatan TPACK,” Pinisi J. PGSD, vol. 5, no. March, pp. 62–68, 2025.

[12] T. Rachmadi, “Literasi Sains dan Tantangan Abad 21,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Dasar, vol. 10, no. 1, 2024.

[13] S. Syarifuddin, D. Isya, A. Abdussahid, and Y. Kusumawati, “The application of the values of the profil pelajar pancasila is concept of kurikulum merdeka in the subject of ipas,” el-Muhbib, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 328–338, 2024, doi: 10.52266/el-muhbib.v8i2.3844.

[14] A. Widiastuti, Merancang Strategi Mengajar di Era Kurikulum Merdeka. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2021.

[15] Nurhadi, Pengembangan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual di Sekolah Dasar. Surabaya: Unesa University Press, 2021.

[16] Suryani, Strategi Pembelajaran Efektif. Malang: UIN Press, 2021.

[17] D. Lestari, Desain Strategi Mengajar Adaptif di Era Merdeka Belajar. Malang: Literasi Nusantara, 2023.

[18] H. Wijaya, Inovasi Strategi Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi di SD. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2023.

[19] B. Suryadi, Kompetensi Profesional Guru di Era Digital. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2021.

[20] R. M. Rawian, “Emotional Intelligence in Classrooms,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 21–26, 2019, doi: 10.35307/SALTEL.V1I2.11.

[21] H. Kusnadi, Transformasi Kompetensi Guru dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2023.

[22] N. Hartati, Psikologi Belajar Anak Sekolah Dasar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu, 2023.

[23] E. Mulyasa, Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2020.

[24] A. Zamroni, Model Pembelajaran Inovatif untuk Abad 21. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2021.

[25] R. Hidayat and N. Lestari, Manajemen Pembelajaran Efektif di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2022.

[26] A. Setiawan, N. Nabela, and P. Kasuma Indah, “The Impact of Compensation, Work Discipline, and Work Motivation on Em ployee Performance (Case study on students working in the MSME sector),” Econ. Educ. Entrep. J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 71–82, 2023, doi: 10.23960/e3j/v6i1.71-82.

[27] A. Prawitasari and M. Herfianti, “pengaruh workload terhadap kinerja dengan dimediasi stres karyawan ojk regional bengkulu,” Creat. Res. Manag. J., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 1, 2020, doi: 10.32663/crmj.v3i2.1384.

[28] D. Lestari, Strategi Meningkatkan Literasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2022.

[29] N. Fitriani, Pembelajaran Terpadu di Era Kurikulum Merdeka. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2022.

[30] K. Suryani, Inovasi Pembelajaran di Era Digital. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo, 2021.

[31] T. Hidayat and E. Susilawati, Model-model Pembelajaran Interaktif untuk Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2021.

[32] N. Hasanah, Manajemen Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2020.

[33] N. My, S. Hajar, and M. N. F. Arsyad, “Applications Utilizing Quizizz for Game-Based Learning in Elementary Science Education,” J. Educ. Comput. Appl. Appl., vol. 1, no. 1, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://jeca.aks.or.id/index.php/jeca/index

[34] M. Najib, Pendekatan Pedagogis dalam Pembelajaran IPAS. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2023.

[35] R. Wardani, Kendala dan Solusi Pembelajaran IPAS di Sekolah Dasar. Surabaya: EduMedia Press, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Atri Yuni, Elpisah Elpisah, Rego Devila, & Suarlin Suarlin. (2026). Teaching Strategies and the Quality of Science Education for Upper Grade Elementary School Students. International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 3(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i1.571