Public Service Innovation Based on Digital Transformation as an Effort to Realize Smart Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i2.626Keywords:
Digital Literacy, Digital Transformation, E-Government, Public Service Innovation, Smart GovernanceAbstract
This research investigates how digital transformation contributes to innovation in public services as part of the move toward smart governance. The study employs a literature review approach by evaluating a variety of pertinent materials, which include global journals, scholarly books, and official publications from the years 2018 to 2025. Results show that digital transformation notably enhances the quality of public services regarding their efficiency, effectiveness, openness, and ease of access. The incorporation of technologies like e-government platforms, mobile apps, artificial intelligence, and big data analysis allows governments to provide services that are quicker and more responsive. Additionally, digital platforms foster public involvement by offering means for communication and participation in decision-making activities. Despite these advancements, there are still several obstacles to overcome, such as the digital divide, insufficient infrastructure, low levels of digital skills, and resistance to change within bureaucracy. These issues emphasize the need for cohesive strategies that include investment in technology, development of human resources, and regulatory assistance. The study concludes that digital transformation is vital for achieving smart governance; however, its effectiveness relies on the preparedness of infrastructure, institutions, and society to embrace digital advancements.
Downloads
References
Alketbi, A., Fish, A., & Al Mansoori, S. (2019). Digital government and m-government: Transformation of public services. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 7(2), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070202
Anthopoulos, L. (2017). Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities, 63, 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.005
Bolívar, M. P. R. (2018). Smart governance: Using a literature review and empirical analysis to build a research model. Social Science Computer Review, 36(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317690299
Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2019). ICTs and value creation in public sector: Manufacturing logic vs service logic. Information Polity, 24(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180099
Criado, J. I., Guevara-Gómez, A., & Villodre, J. (2021). Digital public services: A study of innovation in public administrations. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101583
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002
Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
Klievink, B., Romijn, B. J., Cunningham, S., & de Bruijn, H. (2017). Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9686-2
Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov-ernment Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
OECD. (2019). The path to becoming a data-driven public sector. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/059814a7-en
OECD. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en
Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
