Innovation in Public Policy to Address Aging Society: Lessons from Japan for the Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i2.636Keywords:
Aging Society, Japan, Long-Term Care Insurance, Philippines, Public Policy InnovationAbstract
This study examines the applicability of Japan's aging-related policy innovations, particularly the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system and community-based integrated care models, to the Philippine context. While Japan has developed comprehensive and universal eldercare arrangements, the Philippines continues to rely on familial caregiving amid fragmented service delivery and limited institutional support, raising the problem of how proven innovations can be transferred across different socio-cultural and institutional settings. Utilizing the Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) theory, the research analyzes key innovation attributes—relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity—to evaluate policy transferability. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining comparative policy analysis, case study examination of Japan's innovations, stakeholder interviews and surveys in the Philippines, policy simulation, the Delphi method, and pilot testing of an adaptation framework in selected local government units. Findings reveal that Japan's innovations offer clear relative advantages in expanding eldercare access and reducing service fragmentation, but that the Philippines' familial caregiving tradition, decentralized governance, and constrained fiscal capacity necessitate localized adaptation rather than direct replication. A scaled-down, phased implementation beginning with urban pilot programs, the integration of family roles and barangay-level health initiatives into formal care structures, innovative financing including public-private partnerships, and sustained capacity building at the local government level emerged as critical success conditions. The study concludes that multi-sectoral collaboration, capacity building, and cultural alignment are essential to developing sustainable and inclusive eldercare policies in the Philippines.
Downloads
References
Armstrong, K., Weiner, J., Weber, B., & Asch, D. A. (2003). Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: Who and why. Genetics in Medicine, 5(2), 92–98. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12644778/
Baliola, M., Golpe, M., & Advincula-Lopez, L. V. (2024). Gains and challenges of the Barangay Health Worker (BHW) program during COVID-19 in selected cities in the Philippines. Journal of Health Research, 38(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940X.1060
Carandang, R. R., Olea, A. D., Legaspi, P. K., Quimen, Y., Ebrada, M. N., & Miranda, K. J. (2024). Health care access and quality of life of community-dwelling senior citizens in Pampanga, Philippines. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214241280851
Cruz, G. T., Cruz, C. J. P., & Saito, Y. (2018). Aging in the Philippines. The Gerontologist, 58(2), 212–221. https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article/58/2/212/4792953
Dodd, W., Kipp, A., Nicholson, B., Lau, L. L., Little, M., Walley, J., & Wei, X. (2021). Governance of community health worker programs in a decentralized health system: A qualitative study in the Philippines. BMC Health Services Research, 21, 451. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06452-x
Fu, R., Iizuka, T., & Noguchi, H. (2023). Long-term care in Japan (NBER Working Paper No. 31829). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31829
Garcia, A. P., De la Vega, S. F., Balingbing, A. S., Orlino, M. A. C. D., Herber, J. M. M., & Viloria-Larin, A. L. (2024). Are Filipinos ready for long-term care? A qualitative study on awareness, perspectives, and challenges of relevant organizations, community leaders, carers, and older persons in select sites in the Philippines. Acta Medica Philippina, 58(Early Access), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.9778
Hashimoto, A., Hashimoto, H., & Kawaguchi, H. (2024). Technical efficiency of prevention services for functional dependency in Japan’s public long-term care insurance system: An ecological study. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 13(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8226
Hueskes, M., Koppenjan, J., & Verweij, S. (2016). Support of public–private partnerships in health promotion and disease prevention. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4838703/
Iqbal, M., & Zahidie, A. (2022). Diffusion of innovations: A guiding framework for public health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 50(5), 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948211014104
Iwagami, M., & Tamiya, N. (2019). The long-term care insurance system in Japan: Past, present, and future. JMA Journal, 2(1), 67–69. https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2018-0015
Jin, X., Iwagami, M., Sakata, N., Mori, T., Uda, K., & Tamiya, N. (2022). Regional variation in long-term care spending in Japan. BMC Public Health, 22, 1810. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14194-6
Jin, X., Mori, T., Sato, M., Watanabe, T., Noguchi, H., & Tamiya, N. (2020). Individual and regional determinants of long-term care expenditure in Japan: Evidence from national long-term care claims. European Journal of Public Health, 30(5), 873–878. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa065
Kraus, M., & Riedel, M. (2022). Three dimensions of long-term care provision in middle-income countries—A view across Africa, Latin America and Asia. International Journal of Social Welfare, 31(4), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12537
Makse, T., & Volden, C. (2011). The role of policy attributes in the diffusion of innovations. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000903
Mallari, E., Lasco, G., Sayman, D. J., Amit, A. M. L., Balabanova, D., McKee, M., Palileo-Villanueva, L., Renedo, A., Seguin, M., & Palafox, B. (2020). Connecting communities to primary care: A qualitative study on the roles, motivations and lived experiences of community health workers in the Philippines. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 860. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05699-0
Nilsen, P., & Bernhardsson, S. (2019). Enhancing the impact of implementation strategies in healthcare: A research agenda. Frontiers in Public Health. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6350272/
Nolte, E., & Groenewegen, P. (2021). How can we transfer service and policy innovations between health systems? (Policy Brief No. 40). European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK571993/
Okamoto, S., & Komamura, K. (2022). Towards universal health coverage in the context of population ageing: A narrative review on the implications from the long-term care system in Japan. Archives of Public Health, 80, 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00970-8
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Sano, J., Hirazawa, Y., Komamura, K., Okamoto, S., & Ozaki, A. (2023). An overview of systems for providing integrated and comprehensive care for older people in Japan. Archives of Public Health, 81, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01098-z
Stakeholder engagement in policy development: Observations and lessons from international experience. (2015). In Policy transfer and learning in public policy and management. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282413642
The vanguard of community-based integrated care in Japan: The effect of a rural town on national policy. (2017). International Journal of Integrated Care. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5624097/
Welfare state transition in the making: Focus on the niche-regime interaction. (2019). Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162518314409
Yamada, M., & Arai, H. (2020). Long-term care system in Japan. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 24(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.20.0037
Zhang, W. (n.d.). Obeying an evolving cultural value: Influences of filial piety and collectivist cultural value systems on eldercare expectations and experiences in traditional Asian culture. Duke University. https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



