Disaster Management in Earthquake-Prone Countries: Lessons from the Public Administration Systems of Japan and the Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i2.636Keywords:
Disaster Management, Earthquake, Japan, Philippines, Public AdministrationAbstract
This study examines disaster management strategies in earthquake-prone countries, with a comparative focus on Japan and the Philippines as case studies for lessons applicable to public administration systems worldwide. Using a qualitative comparative analysis approach, the research evaluates institutional frameworks, policy instruments, community engagement mechanisms, and intergovernmental coordination systems deployed in both countries. Japan’s highly centralized yet locally adaptive Disaster Management Basic Act framework is contrasted with the Philippines’ decentralized National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (NDRRM) system. Findings reveal that effective disaster management hinges on five critical pillars: strong legal frameworks, inter-agency coordination, investment in early warning systems, community resilience programs, and post-disaster recovery governance. The study further identifies that public trust, administrative capacity, and fiscal decentralization significantly influence disaster response outcomes. Lessons drawn from both countries offer practical recommendations for developing nations seeking to strengthen their disaster governance architectures. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on comparative public administration and disaster risk reduction, underscoring the imperative of integrated, adaptive, and community-centered governance frameworks in seismically active regions.
Downloads
References
Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226012896.001.0001
Bankoff, G. (2003). Cultures of disaster: Society and natural hazard in the Philippines. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203221891
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cabinet Office of Japan. (2015). Disaster management in Japan. Government of Japan. https://www.bousai.go.jp/1info/pdf/saigaipanf_e.pdf
Comfort, L. K., Boin, A., & Demchak, C. C. (Eds.). (2010). Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events. University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjqm1
Djalante, R., Holley, C., Thomalla, F., & Carnegie, M. (2013). Pathways for adaptive and integrated disaster resilience. Natural Hazards, 69(3), 2105–2135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0797-5
Farazmand, A. (2014). Crisis and emergency management: Theory and practice. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Crisis and emergency management: Theory and practice (pp. 1–24). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17218
Gaillard, J. C., & Mercer, J. (2013). From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512446717
Hoshiba, M., Ozaki, M., Nagano, O., & Yabe, S. (2011). Toward real-time prediction of seismic intensity without magnitude and location. Earth, Planets and Space, 63(5), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.02.014
Kaneko, Y. (2012). Japan’s disaster management system: Lessons from the 2011 East Japan earthquake. Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management, 4(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.3850/S179392402012000283
Lasco, G., & Mayuga, J. (2014). Governing disaster: An analysis of the post-Haiyan recovery governance in the Philippines. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v6i1.111
Lassa, J. A., Surjan, A., Caballero-Anthony, M., & Fisher, R. (2019). Assessing national institutional capacities for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 34, 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.023
Mori, N., Takahashi, T., Yasuda, T., & Yanagisawa, H. (2011). Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049210
Nakagawa, Y., & Shaw, R. (2004). Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22(1), 5–34.
National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council. (2011). National disaster risk reduction and management plan 2011–2028. https://www.ndrrmc.gov.ph
Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831739
Shaw, R., & Goda, K. (2004). From disaster to sustainable civil society: The Kobe experience. Disasters, 28(1), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00241.x
Solidum, R. U. (2008). Earthquake hazard assessment in the Philippines. Journal of Disaster Research, 3(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2008.p0157
Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030
Uy, N., Shaw, R., & Takeuchi, Y. (2011). Advancing local disaster risk reduction: Lessons from CBDRM in the Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2(3), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-011-0011-x
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
