Evaluation of the Trans Halim City Transportation Business Activity Policy, Puskopau Unit, Halim Perdana Kusuma Jakarta, in the Perspective of Public Policy and Law Number 5 of 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i3.671Keywords:
City Transportation, Competitionlaw, Cooperative Exemption, Monopolistic Practices, Public Policy EvaluationAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the public policy of Trans Halim city transportation business activities managed by the Air Force Cooperative Center (PUSKOPAU) at Halim Perdana Kusuma Airport, Jakarta, in the perspective of public policy theory and Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Using empirical juridical research with a socio-legal approach combined with policy evaluation frameworks including the Dunn model and CIPP evaluation approach, this study examines the alignment between PUSKOPAU's territorial-based business operations and the regulatory mandates of Indonesian competition law. Field observations and interviews conducted with drivers, management, and transportation organization representatives confirm that PUSKOPAU operates as a sole provider on specific routes within and around the Halim Perdana Kusuma military complex, constituting indicators of natural monopoly behavior. The study applies rule of reason analysis and public interest theory to assess whether such monopolistic conditions are justified by cooperative law exemptions under Article 50(i) of Law No. 5/1999. Findings reveal that while PUSKOPAU's operations serve member welfare objectives consistent with cooperative law, the extension of services to the general public creates a legal grey area, particularly given the absence of KPPU regulatory guidelines for cooperative exemptions. This legal gap produces significant policy uncertainty and hampers effective enforcement. The article recommends that KPPU promptly formulate specific guidelines for cooperative monopoly exemptions and that formal KPPU investigation procedures be initiated to determine the legality of PUSKOPAU's market dominance.
Downloads
References
Anderson, J. E. (2014). Public Policymaking: An Introduction (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Arba, R. (2015). Praktek Monopoli Taksi Puskopau Di Wilayah Bandara SSK II Pekanbaru Ditinjau Dari Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Praktek Anti Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim.
Bardach, E. (2012). A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving (4th ed.). CQ Press.
Chloupkova, J., Svendsen, G. L. H., & Svendsen, G. T. (2003). Building and destroying social capital: The case of cooperative movements in Denmark and Poland. Agriculture and Human Values, 20(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026141807305
Darmawanto, S. (2017). Implementasi Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Jasa Transportasi di Bandara Sultan Syarif Kasim II Pekanbaru. Jurnal JOM Fakultas Hukum, IV(1), 1–15.
Djuyandi, Y. (2016). Pengawasan DPR-RI Dalam Bisnis Militer Sebagai Bagian Dari Reformasi Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI). Jurnal Wacana Politik, 1(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v1i1.11052
Dunn, W. N. (2014). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (5th ed.). Routledge.
Dye, T. R. (2013). Understanding Public Policy (14th ed.). Pearson Education.
Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Prentice-Hall.
Fahmi, A., Adnan, H., Kamal, H., Toha, S., & Maulana, A. (2017). Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha.
Gellhorn, E., Kovacic, W. E., & Calkins, S. (2004). Antitrust Law and Economics in a Nutshell (5th ed.). West Academic Publishing.
Hermansyah. (2009). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia (2nd ed.). Kencana.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kencana.
Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum (4th ed.). Kencana.
Nugroho, R. (2020). Kebijakan Publik Indonesia: Proses, Analisis dan Partisipasi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Nurhasim, M. (2008). Dilema Menata Bisnis TNI. Jurnal Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, 18 May 2008.
Odudu, O. (2006). The Boundaries of EC Competition Law: The Scope of Article 81. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287185.001.0001
Posner, R. A. (2001). Antitrust Law (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 279–317). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16
Suhasril & Makarao, M. T. (2010). Hukum Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Vedung, E. (1997). Public Policy and Program Evaluation. Transaction Publishers.
Viscusi, W. K., Harrington, J. E., & Vernon, J. M. (2005). Economics of Regulation and Antitrust (4th ed.). MIT Press.
Wahyudi, T. (2010). Military Business in Post-New Order Indonesia: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 41(2), 315–340.
Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2017). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice (6th ed.). Routledge.
Yuhassarie, E., Harnowo, & et al. (2005). Rangkaian Loka Karya Terbatas Masalah-Masalah Kepailitan Dan Wawasan Hukum Bisnis Lainnya. Pusat Pengkajian Hukum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
