The Role of the SIMPD (Official Travel Management Information System) Application in Facilitating Monitoring of Official Travel within the Secretariat of the East Java Provincial DPRD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i3.673Keywords:
DPRD Secretariat, E-Government, Official Travel Monitoring, Policy Implementation, SIMPDAbstract
The Official Travel Management Information System (SIMPD) is a digital-based application developed to support the management and monitoring of official travel activities within the Secretariat of the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) of East Java Province. This study aims to analyze the role of the SIMPD application in facilitating ease of monitoring official travel within the Secretariat of the DPRD of East Java Province. The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach with data collection conducted through observation, interviews, literature study, and documentation. The conceptual framework used in this study is the policy implementation theory proposed by Edwards III, which reviews four key aspects: communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure. The findings indicate that the implementation of SIMPD has generally contributed positively to the management and monitoring of official travel, improving transparency, efficiency, and accountability. However, several challenges remain, including inconsistent socialization, limited human resource capacity, and the need for stronger inter-agency coordination. This study recommends strengthening digital governance infrastructure, increasing the number of trained operators, and enhancing coordination between relevant agencies to optimize SIMPD implementation
Downloads
References
Alfani, D., & Nasution, J. (2022). Implementasi Sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah (SIPD) pada Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(1), 4036–4043.
Alrawabdeh, W. (2014). Examining factors affecting adoption of e-government in Jordan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(1), 210–219.
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). Defining e-governance. e-Service Journal, 8(2), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.2979/eservicej.8.2.3
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Coombs, C., Constantiou, I., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., Gupta, B., Lal, B., Misra, S., Prashant, P., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Sharma, S. K., & Upadhyay, N. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211
Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Fitriani, D., & Yuningsih, N. Y. (2016). Analisis Kebijakan Pemerintah Tentang Pencegahan dan Penanganan Korban Perdagangan Perempuan dan Anak di Kabupaten Cianjur. CosmoGov, 2(2), 330. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v2i2.10007
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 273–285). Sage.
Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and Managing eGovernment: An International Text. Sage Publications.
Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1838–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003
Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
Kumar, R., & Best, M. L. (2006). Impact and sustainability of e-government services in developing countries: Lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India. The Information Society, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240500388149
Laoli, M. I., Ndraha, A. B., & Telaumbanua, Y. (2022). Implementasi SIPD dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah di Pemerintah Kabupaten Nias. Jurnal EMBA, 10(4), 1381–1389. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/emba/article/view/43987
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 70 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Informasi Pemerintah Daerah. Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia.
Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
Ndou, V. D. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x
Peraturan Gubernur Jawa Timur Nomor 48 Tahun 2020 tentang Kedudukan, Susunan Organisasi, Uraian Tugas dan Fungsi serta Tata Kerja Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur.
Rizqi, A. W., et al. (2023). Inovasi Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Penatausahaan Perbendaharaan Online (SIPPOL). Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara, 11(2), 2697–2706.
Savitri, P., & Amaliah, I. S. (2017). Rancang Bangun Sistem Perjalanan Dinas Sekretariat DPRD. Jurnal Informatika, 2(1), 29–36.
Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). e-Government adoption model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006
Situmorang, D. D. C. H. (2016). Kebijakan Publik: Teori, Analisis, Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kebijakan. Media Bangsa.
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of e-government: A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.008
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010
West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector: Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
Zheng, Y., Schachter, H. L., & Holzer, M. (2014). The determinants of citizen demand for e-government adoption in local governments. American Review of Public Administration, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012449585
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
