Evaluating the E-Office Policy in the Corporate Secretary Department of PT Agrinas Jaladri Nusantara (Persero): A Public Policy Implementation and Evaluation Perspective

Authors

  • Restu Prayogi Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Kristyan Dwijosusilo Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Kresna Adhi Prahmana Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i3.677

Keywords:

E-Office, Policy Implementation, Policy Evaluation, Digital Administration, State-Owned Enterprise

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation of the E-Office policy within the Corporate Secretary Department of PT Agrinas Jaladri Nusantara (Persero), an Indonesian state-owned enterprise that recently diversified its core business. While digital administration is widely promoted to improve public-sector effectiveness, many initiatives stall at the implementation stage. Framed by George C. Edwards III’s implementation model (communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure) and William N. Dunn’s policy-evaluation criteria (effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and appropriateness), the research asks how the E-Office workflow operates, how the system supports administrative management, and how ready the staff are to operate it. A descriptive-qualitative case-study design was used; data were gathered through observation, in-depth interviews with four key informants selected purposively, and document analysis, then examined using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana interactive model and source triangulation. The findings show that E-Office accelerates correspondence, increases transparency through digital trails, and eases document tracking, yet its appropriateness and equity remain limited by tiered-approval bottlenecks, technical instability, off-system drafting, rigid letter-numbering rules, under-used features, and uneven staff competence after organisational restructuring. The study concludes that the success of an E-Office policy is not determined by the technology alone but by the interaction among system design, organisational structure, and user behaviour, requiring continuous communication, capacity building, and policy-instrument updates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review, 68(s1), S86–S102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181226

Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.

Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.

Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001

Grindle, M. S. (Ed.). (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400886081

Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment: An international text. SAGE Publications.

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniversary ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.

Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-García, J. R. (2014). Digital government transformation and internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.001

Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1989). Implementation and public policy. University Press of America.

Meijer, A., & Bekkers, V. (2015). A metatheory of e-government: Creating some order in a fragmented research field. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.006

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation (3rd ed.). University of California Press.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Restu Prayogi, Kristyan Dwijosusilo, & Kresna Adhi Prahmana. (2026). Evaluating the E-Office Policy in the Corporate Secretary Department of PT Agrinas Jaladri Nusantara (Persero): A Public Policy Implementation and Evaluation Perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 3(3), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v3i3.677