Juridical Analysis Of The Use Of The Company's Shares As An Object Of Fiduciary Guarantee
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijhs.v1i3.50Keywords:
Juridical Analysis, Company Shares, Fiduciary GuaranteeAbstract
This study aims to analyze juridically the use of the company's shares as an object of fiduciary guarantee in Batam City. The background of this research is rooted in the need for a deep understanding of the effectiveness and security of the company's shares used as fiduciary guarantees, as well as their influence on legal certainty and local economic stability. In Indonesia, the use of shares as fiduciary guarantees is regulated by Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees and Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, but the implementation of this law in the field often encounters various obstacles, especially in Batam City which is a strategic business center. This study uses a qualitative method with a document study approach, in- depth interviews, and field observations to collect data. The subject of this study involves notaries, fiduciary guarantee registration officials, investors, and business actors in Batam. The results of the study show that there are several significant obstacles in the implementation of the use of shares as an object of fiduciary guarantee, which include procedural complexity, variations in notary practices, and limited administrative infrastructure. Despite this, stocks are still a trusted and used instrument because of their liquidity and economic value. Based on these findings, suggestions include expanding education and training for notaries to improve understanding and thoroughness in the fiduciary guarantee administration process. The Batam City Government is advised to update and simplify related regulations to support efficiency and legal certainty. In addition, investments in information technology are needed to modernize the registration and document handling processes, which can increase the transparency and speed of the fiduciary assurance process.
Downloads
References
A'an, E., & others. (2017). Teori hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Ali, A. (2012). Menguak teori hukum (legal theory) dan teori peradilan (judicialprudence). Kencana Prenada Group.
Anonimous. (2023). Buku pedoman penyusunan proposal dan tesis program magister ilmu hukum pascasarjana (S2). Universitas Batam.
Anoraga, P., & Pakarti, P. (2012). Pengantar pasar modal. Rineka Cipta.
Asyhadie, Z. (2015). Hukum bisnis: Prinsip dan pelaksanaan di Indonesia. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Atmasasmita, R. (2019). Teori hukum integratif. Mandar Maju.
Badrulzaman, M. D. (2005). Aneka hukum bisnis (2nd ed.). PT. Alumni.
Bahsan. (2018). Hukum jaminan dan jaminan kredit perbankan Indonesia. Grafindo Raja Persada.
Darmadji, T. (2011). Pasar modal di Indonesia. Salemba Empat.
Friedman, L. M. (2009). Sistem hukum dalam perspektif ilmu sosial: "The legal system: A social science perspective". Nusa Media.
Friedman, W. (2010). Teori dan filsafat hukum: Telaah kritis atas teori-teori hukum (Mohamad Arifin, Trans.). Rajawali. (Original work published [year unknown])
Fuady, M. (2011). Jaminan fidusia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Fuady, M. (2013). Teori-teori besar (grand theory) dalam hukum. Kencana.
Gatot, S. (2014). Transaksi bisnis saham dan penyelesaian sengketa melalui pengadilan. Penerbit Kencana.
Hamzah, A. (2018). Kamus hukum. Citra Umbara.
Huijbers, T. (2011). Filsafat hukum. Kanisius.
Khairandy, R. (2014). Hukum perseroan terbatas. FH UII Press.
Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Muhajir, N. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Roke Sarasin.
Pardede, M. (2006). Implementasi jaminan fidusia dalam pemberian kredit di Indonesia. BPHN Departemen Hukum Dan HAM-RI.
Rahardjo, S. (2016). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rato, D. (2010). Filsafat hukum mencari: Memahami dan memahami hukum. Laksbang Pressindo.
Salim, H. S. (2017). Perkembangan hukum jaminan di Indonesia. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Salim, H. S. (2018). Perkembangan hukum jaminan di Indonesia. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Satrio, J. (2012). Hukum jaminan: Hak-hak jaminan kebendaan fidusia (4th ed.). Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sidharta, A. (2016). Meuwissen tentang pengembangan hukum, ilmu hukum, teori hukum dan filsafat hukum. Refika Aditama.
Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (2009). Metode penelitian survei. LP3ES.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2013). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Radja Grafindo Persada.
Soemitro, R. H. (2015). Metodologi penelitian hukum (2nd ed.). Ghalia Indonesia.
Soeroso. (2011). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Soeryasumantri, J. S. (2008). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Sinar Harapan.
Soewarso, I. (2002). Aspek hukum jaminan kredit. Institut Bankir Indonesia.
Subekti. (2008). Hukum perjanjian (22nd ed.). Intermasa.
Suhartono, I. (2009). Metode penelitian sosial: Suatu teknik penelitian bidang kesejahteraan sosial lainnya. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945; Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata; Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia; Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Usman, R. (2011). Hukum kebendaan. Sinar Grafika.
Widjaja, G., & Yani, A. (2011). Seri hukum bisnis, jaminan fidusia. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Witanto, D. Y. (2015). Hukum jaminan fidusia dalam perjanjian pembiayaan konsumen. Mandar Maju.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
