Digital Public Service Delivery in Local Governments: A Literature Review on Administrative Capacity and Citizen Readiness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijhs.v3i1.566Keywords:
Administrative Capacity, Citizen Readiness, Digital Divide, Digital Government, Local GovernmentsAbstract
The digital transformation of public service delivery has become a central agenda in contemporary public administration, positioning local governments as critical actors in translating national digital strategies into tangible, citizen-facing outcomes. Despite rapid diffusion of digital platforms and e-government initiatives, substantial variation persists in the performance, inclusiveness, and sustainability of digital public services across local contexts. This variation points to persistent challenges related to administrative capacity constraints within local governments and uneven levels of citizen readiness to access and use digital services. Addressing these challenges, this article presents a comprehensive literature review that aims to (1) map the conceptual evolution of digital public service delivery in local governments, (2) synthesize empirical findings on the roles of administrative capacity and citizen readiness, and (3) identify key theoretical and empirical gaps in the existing scholarship. Methodologically, the study adopts a systematic literature review approach, drawing on peer-reviewed journal articles published in the last five years and indexed in major academic databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, DOAJ, and Google Scholar. The selected literature is analyzed using thematic synthesis, guided by an integrated theoretical framework combining Digital Government Theory and Digital Era Governance as overarching transformation lenses, Administrative Capacity and Capacity Building Theory and Competency-Based Human Resource Management to explain organizational and human resource determinants, Digital Divide Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model to capture citizen-side readiness and adoption dynamics, and Policy Implementation Theory to account for institutional and regulatory mediation. The synthesis reveals several dominant patterns: digital service performance is strongly conditioned by leadership, coordination, information capacity, and workforce competencies; citizen uptake is shaped not only by access and skills but also by perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust; and policy design and implementation processes mediate the interaction between supply-side capacity and demand-side readiness. Importantly, the review shows that these factors are mutually constitutive rather than independent, challenging linear and technology-centric models of digital transformation. The article concludes by advancing an integrative conceptual understanding of local digital public service delivery and by outlining theoretical implications for digital public administration research as well as practical policy recommendations for designing inclusive, capacity-sensitive, and sustainable digital public services at the local level.
Downloads
References
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cingolani, L. (2021). The survival of open government platforms: Empirical insights from a global sample. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), Article 101522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101522
Fan, B., & Pan, T. (2023). Does information technology–organizational resource interaction affect e-government performance? Moderating roles of environmental uncertainty. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), Article 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101830
Garcia-Rio, E., Palos-Sanchez, P. R., Baena-Luna, P., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2023). Different approaches to analyzing e-government adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), Article 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101866
Gasco-Hernandez, M., Nasi, G., Cucciniello, M., & Hiedemann, A. M. (2022). The role of organizational capacity to foster digital transformation in local governments: The case of three European smart cities. Urban Governance, 2(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.09.005
Horvath, L., James, O., Banducci, S., & Beduschi, A. (2023). Citizens’ acceptance of artificial intelligence in public services: Evidence from a conjoint experiment about processing permit applications. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), Article 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101876
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (EBSE Technical Report). https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
Luna-Reyes, L. F., Picazo-Vela, S., & Luna, D. E. (2024). Digital government is people: The role of social capital, organizational cultures, and digital inclusion in municipal service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), Article 101965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101965
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Patergiannaki, Z., & Pollalis, Y. A. (2024). E-government quality from the citizen’s perspective: The role of perceived factors, demographic variables and the digital divide. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 37(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2023-0229
Peeters, R., Rentería, C., & Cejudo, G. M. (2023). How information capacity shapes policy implementation: A comparison of administrative burdens in COVID-19 vaccination programs in the United States, Mexico, and the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), Article 101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101871
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Rosenberg, D. (2024). Older adults’ e-government use for bureaucratic and transactional purposes: The role of website-related perceptions and subjective digital skills. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2023-0116
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sundberg, L., & Holmström, J. (2024). Citizen-centricity in digital government research: A literature review and integrative framework. Information Polity, 29(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-220047
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tran Pham, T. K. (2023). Government administrative capacity, e-government performance and citizen’s e-government adoption: Evidence from a transition country. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(3), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2022-0120
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

