From Leadership Training to Service Improvement

A Literature Review on Training Transfer, Change Projects, and Administrative Capacity in Tambrauw Regency Government

Authors

  • Yacoba Tabita Kinho Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Amirul Mustofa Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Sedarmayanti Sedarmayanti Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Dian Ferriswara Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijhs.v3i1.567

Keywords:

Administrative Capacity, Capacity Building, Leadership Training, Public Value, Training Transfer

Abstract

Leadership training has become a key instrument in public sector reform, driven by expectations that public managers act as strategic leaders to improve organizational performance and public service delivery. However, despite substantial investments, public administration research consistently highlights a gap between leadership training participation and tangible service improvements, particularly in resource-constrained local governments. Existing studies often examine leadership training effectiveness, training transfer, organizational change, and administrative capacity separately, resulting in limited integration across these interconnected processes. This fragmentation restricts understanding of how leadership competencies gained through training are transferred into practice, institutionalized through post-training change initiatives (Aksi Perubahan), and translated into sustainable administrative capacity and service outcomes. To address this gap, this integrative literature review synthesizes and critically analyzes peer-reviewed research on public sector leadership training, focusing on training transfer mechanisms, action-based change initiatives, and administrative capacity development in local governments, using the Tambrauw Regency Government as an illustrative context. The review draws on articles indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar published between 2016 and 2025, selected based on public sector relevance and theoretical rigor. Using thematic synthesis and conceptual mapping, the findings show that leadership training contributes to service improvement only when supported by a conducive transfer climate, strong organizational commitment, and structured change projects. These change initiatives mediate the transformation of individual competencies into organizational routines, while administrative capacity determines the sustainability of outcomes. The study contributes to administrative capacity theory and provides practical insights for designing effective leadership training policies in peripheral local government contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ancarani, A., Arcidiacono, G., Di Mauro, C., & Giammanco, M. D. (2021). Promoting work engagement in public administrations: The role of middle managers' leadership and perceived organizational support. Public Management Review, 23(8), 1234–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1763072

Barbera, C., Jansen, E. G., Korac, S., & Saliterer, I. (2025). Navigating crises through organizational capacities and crisis perceptions: Insights from local government managers. Public Administration Review, 85(3), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13859

Benmohamed, A., Shen, J., & Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E. (2024). Public value creation through the use of open government data in the Australian public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), Article 101930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101930

Boak, G., Lovett, J., & O'Leary, A. (2024). Leadership development in fragile contexts: A realist evaluation of the Civil Service Leadership College in Somalia. Public Administration and Development, 44(5), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2040

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Dreyer-Gibney, M. A. (2023). A review of action learning, action research and evaluation methodology using self-efficacy to transfer learning and meet leadership development aims. Change and Innovation Management, 32(3), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12574

Haunstrup, H., & Jensen, J. M. (2024). Leadership development in public organizations: A literature review. International Public Management Journal, 27(5), 684–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2209904

Hughes, J. M., & O'Neill, J. M. (2024). The role of lead agency governance for nonprofit involvement in addressing wicked problems. Public Management Review, 26(5), 944–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2126221

Kim, A. M., & Lee, S. (2023). Pathways to capacity building: A systematic review of training transfer in the public sector. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2030–2058. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2035049

Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., Kinder, T., & Vidal, I. (2021). Public service innovation and service improvement: The role of leadership and organizational capacity. Public Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1900362

Page, M. J. (2021). Leadership and the performance of public sector organizations: A systematic review. Personnel Review, 50(9), 1651–1667. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2020-0472

Quratulain, S. (2021). Public service motivation and autonomy in public organizations: Does experience matter? Public Organization Review, 21, 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00476-w

Setiawan, D. (2022). Leadership agility and servant leadership in public service organizations. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(7), 3239–3244. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i7-50

Shybalkina, I. (2024). Getting a grant is just the first step: Administrative capacity and successful grant implementation. The American Review of Public Administration, 54(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231206823

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Zhang, L., & Li, N. (2022). Improving organizational capacity building based on talent management: A systematic review. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(9–10), 815–831. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2021-0246

Downloads

Published

2026-02-02

How to Cite

Yacoba Tabita Kinho, Amirul Mustofa, Sedarmayanti Sedarmayanti, & Dian Ferriswara. (2026). From Leadership Training to Service Improvement: A Literature Review on Training Transfer, Change Projects, and Administrative Capacity in Tambrauw Regency Government. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 3(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijhs.v3i1.567

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.