Public Perception of Public Services at the Religious Affairs Office of South Dumai District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijhs.v1i1.585Keywords:
Marriage Administration, Office of Religious Affairs, Public Perception, Public Services, Service QualityAbstract
Marriage administration services are a form of public service that has important legal and social implications for the community. The Office of Religious Affairs (KUA), as a technical implementing unit of the Ministry of Religious Affairs, plays a strategic role in providing legal certainty regarding marital status. This study aims to analyze the quality of public services and public perceptions of marriage administration services at the Office of Religious Affairs in South Dumai District. This study used a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation studies, with purposively selected informants consisting of KUA officers and community service users. Data analysis was conducted using the Miles and Huberman interactive model, which includes data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the quality of public services at the KUA in South Dumai District is generally in the good category, particularly in the dimensions of responsiveness, reliability, and assurance. However, the tangible and empathy dimensions still require improvement, particularly related to limited infrastructure and individual attention to the community. This study confirms that the effectiveness of marriage administration services is determined not only by the performance of the apparatus, but also by the level of understanding and readiness of the community as service users. These findings provide important implications for improving the quality of public services through strengthening socialization, procedural transparency, and a more user-oriented service approach.
Downloads
References
Adrian Tawai, A., Rahman, A., & Sari, N. (2022). Kualitas pelayanan administrasi pernikahan di Kantor Urusan Agama. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(2), 115–128.
Afrizal, A., Putra, R., & Yuliani, D. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam administrasi publik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 5(1), 45–56.
Albina, M., & Siregar, R. (2025). Analisis data kualitatif dalam penelitian sosial. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 3(1), 22–35.
Alm, J. (2019). Public service performance and citizen satisfaction. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 589–600.
Dwiyanto, A. (2015). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Karundeng, F., Lumolos, J., & Kimbal, A. (2021). Kualitas pelayanan publik dalam perspektif administrasi negara. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 27(1), 60–72.
Kotler, P. (2002). Manajemen pemasaran. Prenhallindo.
Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntabilitas sektor publik. Andi.
Nur, M. (2018). Peran Kantor Urusan Agama dalam pelayanan administrasi pernikahan. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 6(2), 89–101.
Nursifa, R., & Ekawati, D. (2024). Pengukuran kualitas pelayanan publik berbasis SERVQUAL. Jurnal Pelayanan Publik, 9(1), 33–47.
Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Routledge.
Paulina, P. (2023). Evaluasi pelayanan administrasi nikah di KUA. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan, 10(2), 140–155.
Rahardian, A. (2017). Pelayanan publik dan kepuasan masyarakat. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 4(1), 12–25.
Savira, F. (2022). Konsep analisis dalam penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Humaniora, 7(2), 98–110.
Siregar, M. (2021). Publik dan komunikasi pelayanan publik. Jurnal Komunikasi Publik, 5(1), 44–56.
Siska, R., Putri, N., & Hadi, S. (2024). Transformasi pelayanan KUA berbasis digital. Jurnal Administrasi Keagamaan, 2(1), 1–14.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sutopo, H. B. (2014). Pelayanan publik dan kualitas layanan. LAN Press.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

