Improving Road Safety Governance through Public Service Innovation

Authors

  • Dede Mirza Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lancang Kuning
  • Fitra Hadi Khaz Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lancang Kuning
  • Refdi Refdi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lancang Kuning

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijhs.v1i1.583

Keywords:

Adaptive Capacity, BLUD, Motor Vehicle Testing, Public Service Innovation, Road Safety Governance

Abstract

This study explores how public service innovations in motor vehicle testing, based on Regional Public Service Agencies (BLUD), can improve road safety governance. In regions with rapidly growing motor vehicle populations, inadequate roadworthiness controls contribute to high traffic accident risks. While Indonesia has a regulatory framework for motor vehicle testing, service delivery remains largely administrative and lacks a strong focus on road safety. The study aims to assess how public service innovations can enhance road safety governance through local government-managed vehicle testing based on BLUD. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving local government officials, testing technicians, and service users. Thematic and interpretive data analysis identified governance dimensions that influence service effectiveness. The study finds that road safety governance improvement relies on four main capacities: relational, structural, resource, and adaptive. Although BLUD-based management offers flexibility for service innovation, its implementation has not fully aligned with road safety goals. Challenges remain in public trust, cross-agency coordination, resource availability, and organizational learning. The study concludes that integrating public service innovation with institutional capacity building and safety-focused performance management is essential for strengthening road safety governance. These findings highlight the strategic importance of motor vehicle testing in enhancing road safety and public value at the regional level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Routledge.

Dwiyanto, A. (2015). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Elvik, R., Høye, A., Vaa, T., & Sørensen, M. (2009). The handbook of road safety measures. Emerald Group Publishing.

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2005.00454.x

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Mardiasmo. (2018). Otonomi dan manajemen keuangan daerah. Andi.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.

OECD. (2020). Road safety annual report. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264367880-en

Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.

Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. Chatham House Publishers.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

World Health Organization. (2018). Global status report on road safety 2018. WHO Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Dede Mirza, Fitra Hadi Khaz, & Refdi Refdi. (2024). Improving Road Safety Governance through Public Service Innovation. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 1(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijhs.v1i1.583

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.